General Q&A: 09/09/2026
00:00:29 Kevin: Hi Mark. Q: In order to separate the liabilty of a sports association incorporated entity from the association President or the sports club President, do you have any tips with respect to writing set up questions to be directed to the Association as opposed to the Presidents (i.e. the man)? How do you separate the man from the incorporated association entity?
Q: For the same matter above, who is liable where there was non-compliance of their Constitution rules, the man (i.e. the President) or the incorporated Association entity or both, or where discrimination occurred on assumed medical risk of having Covid for not signing in, or human rights or privacy breaches committed?
00:01:06 Kevin: I have written twice to the former lawyer of the law firm previously representing the sports association & sports club requesting written confirmation from him if (1) your law firm will again be representing your former clients in this discrimination matter and (2) if you will accept service of my legal documents via email, to which he has now failed or refused to reply to both times now.
Q: In order to get confirmation from him as it would solve my problem of having to serve his clients after business hours, do you think if I were to write to him a 3rd time seeking confirmation of (1) and (2) above by putting it in a formal Notice & Demand for Further & Better Particulars, then would the third default/defaultjudgement against him be legally valid (despite not sending 2 previous notices; emails only sent)?
Q: Would the court uphold this default judgement if the lawyer said that he hadn’t informed me that he was representing his former clients or agreed to accepting servicing of documents via email from me
00:01:15 Kevin: despite there being a private settleemnt agreement between us confirming that he would be representing his former clients and would accept service via email from me?
00:03:27 Kevin: Q: How would you respond to a judge in court where they are not allowing you to rely on Articles from the International Covenant of Civil & Political Rights under the Australaian Human Rights Commission Act 2004 which is part of the (or HR&R Act) saying “We don’t care about that” or “This is not an International court. We only deal with Acts and statutes”.
Q: Where a judge or lawyer said the Human Rights & Responsibilities Act (HR&R Act) 2006 (VIC) doesn’t apply here in SA, if I responded with “Am I not allowed to invoke and refer to the laws of another State where relevant in my matter or there are precedents” does this sound reasonable?
00:14:59 Kevin: Q: For the same sports matter, how would you invoice the Asssociation as opposed to the Presidents of the Association or the sports club? Does this mean when you write up your invoices, you would be invoicing both the Association and the President/s for the same items e.g. privacy breach or human rights breaches, discrimination on medical grounds without providing evidence etc?
00:20:41 Kevin: Hi Mark, can you please repeat what you said about lawyers citing case law from other states. Unfortunately the sound dropped out and I missed an important part of your response.
00:25:49 : My understanding is that the ATO are acting unlawfully if they cause harm to you. Psychological harm, distress, embarrassment. They are not allowed to act in ways that cause this
00:29:32 : Can you please explain the true ‘relationship’ an individual citizen (i.e. myself) has with the ATO in order that we pay tax. I am needing to address overdue returns where an assessment has not been done but naturally am looking to determine if I lawfully HAVE to pay these returns.
00:33:56 Daisy Doone: QUESTION… What if a corporation says that PN or BOE is not legal tender, and they do not have to accept a PN or BOE, I realise that a refusal of a tender of payment discharges the alleged liability to pay a debt, but still the will not discharge the liability, So is a boe or PN not legal tender? It is the same as cash though? As per lord Denning?
00:37:41 Daisy Doone: Question… can you not draw up your will yourself
00:39:22 Kevin: Q…In my promissory notes loan payment matter involving the loan manager company where my statutory demand matter was dismissed because the registrar ruled he had no jurisdiction to hear the matter because there was a court portal problem with the company stating (not in an affidavit) they couldn’t serve their affidavit on me before the 21 day statutory demand period expired, do you think I could be successful against this company given they breached the default & liability clause (100 hrs > 72 hrs), or because the courts rule in favour of corporations, do you think I would be spending time on a matter that will never have a successful outcome with a judgement made in my favour because this matter involves a corporation and secondly because it involves payment of loans using promissory notes and their not going to create a precedent for that?
00:39:25 Kevin: Q…If I don’t invoice the loan manager company every so often, could that be used against me or be to my detriment as I haven’t sent them any invoice or followed up with the company after the statutory demand court hearing back in October 2024 which the loan manager company filed in their defence to have the SD set aside?
00:49:07 Kevin: Given I want the sports association President, the sports club President and the Covid marshal to each pay me damages individually, not just be jointly liable, how would I make sure they each pay me a nominated amount? Specify different amounts for each of them on the invoice? Divide the total damages by the 4 i.e. one amount for the Association, and 3 separate amounts for the other 3 individuals?
01:01:29 Daisy Doone: Question..have you/do you bond the cases at court? Ie you out bond the judges?
01:03:46 Paul- Spencer: Q: How do you think the best way to put your son/ beneficiary onto the current land title? Gifting? Also, do you think that we have to pay a sales tax or stamp duty? Thanks
01:20:53 Kevin: Q…If you loaned a company money and in return they agreed to pay you interest on the loan and give you other benefits too (additional financial & non-financial benefits), then if you had to submit a tax return because you had to tick the Yes (you will need to submit a tax return next year) box on the prevous return, because it is a private matter, then you wouldn’t have to declare because everything you gained is due to the productivity of my labour. Would you agree this would be the best way of dealing with the tax office if they came after you for not declaring it on your tax return?
01:21:01 Paul- Spencer: Q: Would you share the Legal Practitioner that you used to do your will? On the website maybe!! You’d have to warn them!!
Responses